Positive and negative aspects of Credit system in University: some results of the research

UDC 37.09-044.3:308

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-21.055

O.A. Koryakovtseva is Dr.Sci. (Political Science), Director of Institute of Development of Human capacity at Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University n.a. K.D. Ushinsky e-mail: youth1@mail.ru

 

Analyzed is the role of credit system students’ knowledge grade in education growth. With this purpose it was made social research in VIP University of CFO. It was researched some students of 1–4th courses and teachers. There’re some results of depth-interview with position experts. It’s fixed that the most part of the students says that credit system (BGS) help to grow their motivation to fundamental and professional study and create their skills and habits and stimulate their systematic self-cultivation. Girls more than man sure that credit-system make impossible to protect unable and unteachable students, become make objective valuations of study capacity. Teachers also sure that credit system stimulate student’s every-day work, make educational technology better and optimized study process. In addition to that, some of them suppose that credit system make far more individual duty of teacher: now it’s necessary not only to write in individual plan-report of study work, but also write in different forms in credit-system. They have not any time to teaching development. The whole, a large part of teacher-respondents (without reference to gender, age or science degree and science order) think that credit system (BGS) is necessary. Base on incovered values and weaknesses of the system of grading, in the article suggested are some actions for its effectiveness growth.

Key words: knowledge grade, study, students, credit system, knowledge checking.

 

References

1. Konstantinovsky, D.L., Popova, E.S. The youth in the sphere of education: waiting and motivations. In: Russia reforming: Yearbook. Iss. 15. Moscow: New Chronograph, 2017. P. 154–174.

2. Talanov, S.L. Transformation of values of student youth under conditions of dynamic of social changes. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 2. P. 32–41. DOI: 10.20339/AM.02-20.032

3. Koryakovtseva, O.A., Tarkhanova, I.Yu., Dosse, T.G. Tutor accompaniment of adult students: possibilities and perspectives. Yaroslavl pedagogical vestnik. 2015. No. 5. P. 100–103.

4. Nussbaum, M., Diaz, A. Classroom logistics: Integrating digital and non-digital resources. Computers & Education. 2013. Vol. 69. Nov. P. 493–495.

5. Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., & Resnik, M. Extending tangible interfaces for education: Digital Montessori inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of CHI 05. New York: ACM Press, 2005.

6. Zubova, L.V., Rener, E.I., Rozhina, T.D., Stepanova, O.S. Problems of using of ball-raiting system at university for the control of training educational results of students. Pedagogical education in Russia. 2016. No. 10. P. 53–60.

7. Sazonov, B.A. Ball rating systems of evaluation of knowledge and guaranteeing quality of educational process. Higher education in Russia. 2012. No. 6. P. 28–40.

8. Starichenko, B.E. Ball rating system of evaluation training activity of students: problems of modeling. Pedagogical education in Russia. 2017. No. 6. P. 205–215.