Devolution processes and the theory of historical development by S. Sanderson

UDC 172+321

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-21.072

 

A.V. Verkhoturov is Cand.Sci. (Philosophy), senior researcher in Laboratory for Analysis of Integration Processes in Contemporary Eurasia e-mail: anatolyvr@mail.ru; and A.A. Obukhov is Cand.Sci. (Economics), senior researcher in Laboratory for Analysis of Integration Processes in Contemporary Eurasia e-mail: a.obukhov@nsu.ru. Both at Novosibirsk State University

 

Analyzed is one of the most comprehensive modern approaches to the problem of the existence of evolution of human society as such and of specific human communities, i.e. “General Theory of Historical Development” by American historian and sociologist Stephen Sanderson. While agreeing, in general, with its main ideas, we believe that it is important to note that the issue of existence of individual communities demonstrating devolution (regression to an earlier historical state), stagnation or degeneration at certain historical stages is practically ignored in the framework of the theory under consideration. This creates its vulnerability in the face of specific empirical data, indicating a deviation from the evolutionary trend. We believe that overcoming this theoretical difficulty is possible in the process of comprehending the theory of S. Sanderson in the context of ideas of the world-system approach of Immanuel Wallerstein. We want to show that examples of devolution, stagnation and degeneration of societies do not deny general progressive evolutionary tendencies, characteristic for the world-system as a whole, but only indicate the transition of a particular society to a lower level within the world-system (from the core to the semi-periphery, or from the semi-periphery to the periphery).

Key words: social evolution, causality, devolution, S. Sanderson, I. Wallerstein, world-system.

 

References

1. Diamond, J. Collapse: why any societies come to prosperity, but others to destruction. Moscow: AST, 2008.

2. Chase-Dunn, C., Hall, T.D. Conceptualizing core / periphery hierarchies for comparative study. Wesview Press, 1991.

3. Mann, M. The sources of social power: Vol. 1. A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge University Press, 1986.

4. Nisbet, R. Social change and history: aspects of the Western theory of development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.

5. Sanderson, S. Social Evolutionism. A critical history. Blackwell, 1990.

6. Sanderson, S. Social transformations. A general theory of historical development. Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.

7. Tainter, J. The collapse of complex societies. New York: Cambridge Ubiversity Press, 1988.

8. Wallerstein, I. The West, Capitalism and the Modern World-System. Review. 1992. Vol. 15. No. 4.

9. Wallerstein, I. World-System Perspective on the Social Sciences. In: I. Wallerstein. The Capitalist World-System. Essays. Cambridge etc., Paris, 1979. P. 153–155.